Best Electric Toothbrush UK: 7 Worth Buying
- Nyheter
Find the best electric toothbrush in the UK, including SURI 2.0, Oral-B iO3, Oral-B Pro 3 and Sonicare alternatives, with features and prices.
The Dyson V15 Detect is the best cordless vacuum cleaner for most UK homes. Expert Reviews names the Dyson V15 Detect Absolute its best overall cordless vacuum, while Homes & Gardens names the Dyson V15 Detect its best cordless vacuum after testing 34 cordless vacuums for more than 1,000 hours.
For a cheaper alternative, the Shark PowerDetect range is worth considering. Which? reports that the Shark cordless models it tests cost nearly £200 less on average than the Dyson models it tests. The Henry Quick Pro is another strong UK option: The Independent names it the best overall cordless vacuum in its 2026 guide.
If you are replacing a corded cleaner, prioritise tested cleaning performance on your main floor type, along with the model’s battery and dust-capacity arrangements. Published suction figures in pascals and air watts use different units and should not be treated as directly comparable without a standardised test method.
These five models cover the main buying priorities, from an expert-tested overall winner to carpet, budget and value options. Prices below are the listed UK prices reported by the named retailers or publications and can change.
| Model | Best for | UK price or key detail |
|---|---|---|
| Dyson V15 Detect | Best overall | £499.99 on offer at John Lewis, reduced from £649.99 |
| Henry Quick Pro | UK all-rounder | £399 from Currys, according to The Independent |
| Shark PowerDetect Speed | Value alternative to Dyson | £430; T3 describes its suction as among the strongest it tested |
| Miele Duoflex HX1 Totalcare | Carpets | £499 from John Lewis, according to The Independent |
| Akitas cordless vacuum | Budget buying | £59.99 from Amazon UK, according to The Independent |
Choose the Dyson V15 Detect if you want the best-supported all-round recommendation. Expert Reviews names the V15 Detect Absolute its best overall cordless vacuum, while Homes & Gardens names the Dyson V15 Detect its best cordless vacuum. John Lewis lists the V15 Detect Absolute at £499.99 on offer, reduced from £649.99.
Expert Reviews tests cordless cleaners on wood, carpet and pet hair using measured quantities of flour, Cheerios and pet hair. That makes the Dyson a sensible choice for mixed-floor homes and households where loose hair is a regular problem. Its recommendation is based on practical testing rather than advertised suction figures alone.
The Dyson V15 Detect is the clearest pick for pet hair. Expert Reviews names it the best overall cordless vacuum and explicitly includes pet hair in its testing, alongside wood and carpet. That is more useful evidence than choosing a model solely because its packaging claims a large suction number.
The Shark PowerDetect is the main alternative when price matters. T3 reports that the Shark PowerDetect Speed costs £430 in the UK and describes its suction power as among the strongest tested by the publication. Which? places tested Shark cordless models nearly £200 below tested Dyson models on average, making Shark a lower-priced route for regular hair removal.
Pick the Miele Duoflex HX1 Totalcare for carpets and the Dyson V15s Detect Submarine for hard floors. The Independent names the Miele the best cordless vacuum for carpets at £499 from John Lewis. It names the Dyson V15s Detect Submarine the best cordless vacuum for hard floors at £799 from Currys.
The Dyson V15s Detect Submarine is also listed by John Lewis at £599.99 on offer, reduced from £749.99. For a home with both surfaces, the Dyson V15 Detect remains the more broadly supported choice; for predominantly carpeted rooms, the Miele has the clearest category-specific recommendation.
The Dyson V12 Detect Slim is the leading lightweight option in the current stick-vacuum ranking from RTINGS. RTINGS names it the best stick vacuum in its 2026 ranking, highlighting its cleaning performance and low weight. The same ranking includes the Dyson V15 Detect, Shark Stratos Cordless IZ862H, Dyson V8, Tineco PURE ONE S11 and Wyze Cordless Vacuum S in other price or performance categories.
The V12 is a useful choice for shoppers who regularly carry a vacuum upstairs or clean quickly between larger sessions. RTINGS’ ranking also separates models by performance and price, rather than treating one vacuum as the best choice for every home.
The Sixpad S80 and Ventix Hypersonics Pro target buyers searching for a cheaper cordless vacuum than Dyson or Shark. Their published specifications make them easy to compare, but the figures are manufacturer or retailer claims rather than independent cleaning-test results.
| Model | Listed price | Published suction claim | Runtime | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sixpad S80 | £179.99 on the Sixpad UK store, reduced from £359.99 | More than 45,000 Pa on Sixpad’s product page; 38,000 Pa at Barkley Home Stores | 55 minutes | 2.8 kg |
| Ventix Hypersonics Pro | £179 at Ventix; £159 at Harlix | 13,000–27,000 Pa | 50 minutes | 2.85 kg |
The conflicting Sixpad figures are important for anyone comparing the S80 with the Ventix hoover or with premium models. The S80’s own UK product page claims more than 45,000 Pa, while Barkley Home Stores lists 38,000 Pa. The Ventix Hypersonics Pro is listed as model VC101 and also has a 1-litre dust cup; Harlix lists its charging time as 4.5 hours and noise level as 53 dB.
Recent Sixpads.uk Trustpilot reviews include individual UK complaints about weak suction, short battery life, blockages, power faults and customer service. These reports are not independent laboratory tests, but they are relevant when weighing the S80 against models with established expert testing. The Sixpad is therefore best treated as a specification-led budget purchase, not as a proven rival to the Dyson V15 or Shark PowerDetect.
Shark is generally the better-value choice, while Dyson has the stronger premium recommendation in this guide. Which? reports that the Shark cordless vacuum cleaners it tests cost nearly £200 less on average than the Dyson models it tests. Shark is therefore a sensible starting point if your budget is tighter or you want to spend less on a frequently used cleaner.
Dyson remains the better fit if you want the model with the clearest support from named expert guides. The right choice depends chiefly on your floor type and whether pet-hair performance is a priority. Shark’s PowerDetect Speed also has a strong performance claim from T3, while Dyson’s V15 has recommendations from both Expert Reviews and Homes & Gardens.
There is no single independently established “worst cordless vacuum cleaner” ranking in the supplied UK testing. For a practical buying decision, the Sixpad S80 deserves more caution than the Dyson, Shark, Henry or Miele picks above because its advertised suction figures differ between sellers and recent customer reviews report several performance and support problems. That does not prove that every S80 will fail, but it makes the model a weaker evidence-based choice than the independently tested alternatives.
The same distinction applies to Ventix: the Hypersonics Pro has detailed published specifications and a lower price, but the supplied evidence does not place it in the independent test rankings used for the main recommendations. Its 13,000–27,000 Pa claim should not be ranked directly against the Sixpad’s Pa figures or Dyson’s quoted 230 air watts.
The three leading names across the current recommendations are the Dyson V15 Detect, Shark PowerDetect and Henry Quick Pro. Expert Reviews and Homes & Gardens name the Dyson V15 Detect their overall winner, T3 describes the Shark PowerDetect Speed’s suction as among the strongest it tested, and The Independent names the Henry Quick Pro its best overall cordless vacuum for 2026. Listed prices are £499.99 for the Dyson V15 Detect Absolute at John Lewis on offer, £430 for the Shark PowerDetect Speed according to T3 and £399 for the Henry Quick Pro from Currys according to The Independent.
Neither brand is best for every buyer. Dyson is the stronger premium recommendation here, while Shark generally offers lower prices. Which? reports that its tested Shark cordless models cost nearly £200 less on average than its tested Dyson models. Choose between the brands by considering the model’s floor suitability and the importance of pet-hair performance.
Advertised suction figures do not establish a reliable winner. Sixpad claims more than 45,000 Pa for the S80, although Barkley Home Stores lists the same model at 38,000 Pa. Ventix claims up to 27,000 Pa for the Hypersonics Pro, while Dyson V15 is quoted at 230 air watts in one comparison. As RTINGS explains through its comparison methodology, pascals and air watts are different measurements and cannot be ranked directly without a common test method. The strongest evidence in this guide therefore comes from independent cleaning tests, not the largest printed suction number.
